Implication of Notary Law Service Institutions for Unafficient Person

Authors

  • Erika Lismayanti Universitas Cahaya Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48171/dejure.v5i1.170

Keywords:

Implications , Notary Legal Services , Free Cost

Abstract

This research is a study to find the characteristics of notary legal services for free of charge and to find the implications of notary legal services for free for people who are unable to apply the provisions of Article 37 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law Number 2 of 2014 regarding the Position of Notary Public.The research method used is Normative-Emperis legal research, which is a library research or study on written regulations or other legal materials that are adapted to field studies based on the results of interviews with several notary officials with legal status in Kediri Regency as respondents as objects. research. Conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and statutory approach (statute approach). This research examines and analyzes the provision of legal services free of charge by notaries for people who cannot afford it in relation to Article 37 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Position. Hans Kelsen's Theory of Legal Effectiveness regarding the concept of effectiveness focuses on the subject and sanctions. The findings of this study indicate that there is a conflict of norms between the provisions of Article 37 paragraph (1) & paragraph (2) of the Law on Notary Office Number 2 of 2014 which can lead to multiple interpretations so as to result in legal uncertainty for the service performance of Notary officials

References

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia (Perspektif Hukum dan Etika). UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legis Prudence), Kencana, Jakarta, 2013.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012.

Dellyana, Shant, Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta, Liberty, 1988.

Djoko Soepadmo, Teknik Pembuatan Akta Seri 1 Bagian Pertama (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1996).

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Erlangga, Jakarta, 1991.

Habib Adjie, 2007, Sanksi Perdata & Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, PT Refika Aditama, Surabaya (selanjutnya disebut Habib Adjie III).

Islina Yuliyanti, Yulia Qamariyanti, Mahyuni,Akibat Hukum Keterlambatan Pendaftaran Peralihan HakAtas Tanah Terhadap Akta Yang DibuatOleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah, Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol 3 Issue 1, March (2018).

Muhammad Hadin Muhjad, Jabatan Notaris Dalam Persfektif Hukum Administrasi,Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol 3 Issue 1, March (2018)

Pandam Nurwulan, Perspektif Notaris tentang Penyidikan dan Masalahnya Berkenaan dengan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 (Yogyakarta: Makalah, 2006).

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Implication of Notary Law Service Institutions for Unafficient Person. (2024). DE JURE Critical Laws Journal, 5(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.48171/dejure.v5i1.170